Usuari:KRLS/TR/vo

Answers by comunity order: Català - English - Castellano - Deutsch - Français - Polski - 日本語 - Nederlands - Italiano - Português - Svenska - Русский - 中文 - Norsk (Bokmål) - Suomi - Volapük - Română - Türkçe - Esperanto - Slovenčina

This is a survey for my Research Project with aim to know the indicators that measure the quality of an article according to the wikipedist community. If you want to answer this survey, just follow the link EDIT, copy and paste the pattern below, paste it in the end and answer the questions. I need tour help! I’m in a hurry so please; answer it as soon as you can.

Attention: Please, do not edit the pattern, just copy and paste in the bottom of the page and answer following the pertinent indications with (<-- -->).

If you have a problem with some questions you can say me your problems in my talk.

Template

vo:User:

• Country:
• Age:
• Sex:

1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.

Quality indicator	Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.
2. The size of a wikipedia article.
3. The number of users.
4. Number of active users.
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.
6. Number of edits for article
7. The number of maintenance templates
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance
10. References of external sources.
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.
12. Community contributions to these projects
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.
15. Structure of the categories.
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).
20. External links to help visitors find more information.

1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

Answers

vo:User:Malafaya

• Country: Portugal
• Age: 33
• Sex: Male

1. You have to fill the following table just with a number from 0 to 10, according to how much you agree with the sentence. 0 means you totally disagree and 10 you totally agree.

Quality indicator	Your qualification from 0 to 10
1. The number of articles.	5
2. The size of a wikipedia article.	8
3. The number of users.	3
4. Number of active users.	6
5. The speed of the vandalisms reversions.	4
6. Number of edits for article	1
7. The number of maintenance templates	4
8. Number of articles with a maintenance templates	2
9. Number of users that contribute with the wikipedia maintenance	6
10. References of external sources.	7
11. Projects specifically dedicated to improve wikipedia's quality.	9
12. Community contributions to these projects	9
13. Number of quality articles, good articles...	6
14. Number of visitors of a wikipedia.	8
15. Structure of the categories.	7
16. Redaction and clarity of the articles.	8
17. Existence of images at wikipedia articles.	8
18. Are most of your articles at an ordinary encyclopedia?	3
19. Variety of terms (not included at ordinary encyclopedias).	5
20. External links to help visitors find more information.	6

1. Are there other quality indicators? Which:

• Depth as listed in the m:List of Wikipedias, but it just measures the level of "collaborativeness" and not encyclopedic quality. Basically, the more "straw" you have around the articles the better measure you get. In my opinion, it's not a very good indicator.
• m:List of Wikipedias by sample of articles as it includes relevant articles in many topics and evaluates quality based on the size of those important subjects.

---

---

---

---

---

Comments

I'd just like to congratulate you for the idea and I wish a good outcome will come from this survey.